Road works and traffic organisation
2015 | Dec
If we were to describe roads based exclusively on their geometry, position and vehicle movement, we would omit a very important aspect: the activity that develops on them. The road is, or at least was, public space for thousands of years in previously compact cities – operating as a front yard for the vast majority of houses, which only had limited interior spaces, only a few square meters in size. Staying indoors was thus unpleasant, while plots did not have any open, unbuilt space. Access to the road was immediate since construction was low in height and mainly ground-level. At the time, the road was a place where one could walk but also stand, meet and receive information. Distances were small, because the size of cities was always proportional to transport availability. Because at that time people mainly walked, the radius of the city’s limits was very small.
The area of Athens remained about the same in size from ancient times until its liberation from the Turks, when the wall of Haseki was demolished. In 1830, Athens did not even have roads for carriages. The means of transport were mules and camels. The first carriages were introduced during the era of Kapodistrias and they were the reason for the first roadworks. Thereafter, until the early 20th century, when cars were introduced and shortly after the influx of refugees from Asia Minor, the size of the capital was extremely limited. The city’s radius barely exceeded 4 kilometres, measuring from Omonoia Sq outward. Initially, the city relied on trams (originally horse-drawn) and later on buses. In the early 60s, with car ownership rapidly increasing, everything changed. Images of trees, people standing or walking by, children playing begun to wane while single family houses were replaced by apartment buildings. The city expanded rapidly, both in height and horizontally.
As the car played a significant role in the new urban reality, there was a growing need for radial roads, connecting the periphery to the centre. Large urban roads had been planned since the 19th century, originally based on the plan of Kleanthis and Schaubert. These included roads such as Stadiou, Pireos, Athinas, Ermou … Their layouts did not foresee the advent of the car. They were created to enrich the irregular medieval street system of the city with boulevards, i.e. linear public spaces both for traffic (mostly walking) and for standing. Their additional purpose was to overcome the city’s Byzantine – Turkish image and replace it with linear and symmetrical interventions based on neoclassical layouts, associating it directly with its classical past, to better serve the new role that Europe had assigned to Athens.
Panepistimiou Str. was quickly added to the plan as a road parallel to Stadiou Str. Together with the road mirroring it -which today has been shortened and scaled down to Kerameikos Str.- it would circumscribe the northern neoclassical part of Athens. The south part, including the areas of Psyri, Monastiraki and Plaka, essentially maintained the Byzantine grid system. Their purpose was to define the historic city, giving it an easily understandable and regular shape, consistent with the rationalism of neoclassical city planning that had allegedly embraced the design principles of the ancient classics.
In 1878, Athens acquired two more much larger-scale, straight, non-neoclassical but functional layouts: Alexandras and Syngrou Avenues. The former, which was absolutely urban and finite, between Patission Avenue and Kifisias Avenue, progressively became a large cultural boulevard in pre-war and post-war Athens. The latter turned into a highway, causing serious permeability and environmental problems to the neighbourhoods of Kallithea and Nea Smyrni.
Syngrou Avenue is one of many examples -perhaps the most spectacular- of ancient or Byzantine routes linking the Byzantine city to its periphery, which were turned into radial roads of the modern centre. This road infrastructure also affected the distribution of activities in modern Athens, which developed linearly along radial roads, in order to ensure optimal access. The translocation of business activities to the periphery, as happened in most cities in Europe, was impossible, since there were no highways or bypass motorways, such as Attiki Odos.
Inner suburbs, mushrooming at a fast pace around central Athens, were built almost with the same high density as the central residential areas of the capital in the early 1970s. Their high density is due to the fact that individual land owners systematically prevented the State from implementing plans that would use part of their land in order to make pavements broad enough for walking, create resting and green areas, bike lanes or bus lanes. No real plan was ever implemented in Athens. Quite often, consecutive legalisations of interventions already made were brought about. For example, already in 1925, the urban plan of Athens dealt with the merger of 79 separate plans and 502 amendments, private road approvals, for-profit extensions following landowner initiatives etc. Thus, Athens achieved very little towards the direction of a “public” city. It remained “private”. The individual sphere always came before public interests and this is reflected in the striking differentiation of investments between privately constructed buildings and the public road network, which, in residential areas, was turned into a vast parking lot. The few exceptions to this trend are certain main roads that serve intercity purposes like the Syngrou – Kallirois – Vasileos Constantinou – Vassilissis Sofias Avenue, the highway to Thessaloniki, Posidonos Avenue and Attiki Odos, a privately managed road. It is worth mentioning that Attiki Odos significantly contributed in mitigating the limited connectivity between western and central/eastern Athens. All those roads, combined with an increase in car ownership, led to an increase in car traffic, which was not arrested by the construction of the metro.
Effective traffic planning, which would prioritise the road network and remove through-traffic flows from neighbourhoods, was never implemented. “Calm traffic areas” with a maximum speed of 30 km/hour, “quiet neighbourhoods”, “bicycle lanes” -where bikes and cars coexist, though the priority is given to the former-, “green roads” or “green flows”, “roads ensuring harmonious coexistence between users”, “urban boulevards” and many other solutions, frequently found in European cities, are rarely encountered in Athens, because nobody has dared to set as a priority what the European Union has been asking for quite a few years: a reduction in the number of cars and to the speed of car circulation. On the contrary, the policy of the ministry in charge is to passively accept developing flows and diffuse them, even by using neighbourhoods to circumvent saturated segments of main roads. Questions such as “how many cars can the environment of Athens and each road separately accommodate?” do not arise. The solutions implemented against saturation issues are always ad hoc and lead to further elimination of the scarce space left for pedestrians and vegetation.
The fate of the road network is connected to the fate of public transport, walking and cycling. If Athens, honouring its role as a European capital, was to focus on the promotion of those three pillars of sustainable mobility, then space would have to be taken away from cars and allocated to alternative modes of transport. If that was to happen, a new era for the city’s streets would begin.. The streets’aesthetics would improve and they would become attractive points for living, meeting and socialising. The benefits for the environment, health and the economy would be immense.
On the contrary, while the streets in the neighbourhoods of Athens are left as they are, current discussions focus on creating new highways once the crisis is over, to support the expansion of Athens. Some examples are the undersea tunnel of Salamina and the tunnel of Argyroupolis, through mount Ymittos. These plans will integrate Salamina and Mesogeia in the metropolitan area. The Argyroupolis tunnel in particular would mean that a second Syngrou Avenue, this time from the east, will terminate in Syntagma Square. These projects will inevitably caus car traffic in the capital to increase and with it the side-effects of car traffic will be accentuated.
Entry citation
Vlastos, T. (2015) Road works and traffic organisation, in Maloutas T., Spyrellis S. (eds) Athens Social Atlas. Digital compendium of texts and visual material. URL: https://www.athenssocialatlas.gr/en/article/road-works/ , DOI: 10.17902/20971.56
Atlas citation
Maloutas T., Spyrellis S. (eds) (2015) Athens Social Atlas. Digital compendium of texts and visual material. URL: https://www.athenssocialatlas.gr/en/ , DOI: 10.17902/20971.9
References
- Βλαστός Θ (2004) Η ανθρώπινη κλίμακα στον κυκλοφοριακό σχεδιασμό στην εποχή της παγκοσμιοποίησης των μεταφορών. Οικοτοπία 29: 30–33.
- Βλαστός Θ (2011) Βιώσιμος κυκλοφοριακός σχεδιασμός και οι πραγματικές ανατροπές για τη σημερινή ελληνική πόλη. Η περίπτωση του κέντρου της Αθήνας. ΕΛΙΑΜΕΠ. Available from: http://www.diavouleusi.eliamep.gr/house-policy/βιώσιμος-κυκλοφοριακός-σχεδιασμός-κ/ (ημερομηνία πρόσβασης 11 Μάρτιος 2011).
- Βλαστός Θ (2012) Ελεγείο του αστικού συμπαγούς. Σχόλια ως προς τις χωρικές και κοινωνικές προϋποθέσεις για την προσπελάσιμη πόλη σε συνθήκες εντεινόμενης οικονομικής ανισότητας. Περιβάλλον και Δίκαιο 3: 435–448.
- Βλαστός Θ και Μηλάκης Δ (2006) Πολεοδομία vs μεταφορές: από την απόκλιση στη σύγκλιση. 1η έκδ. Αθήνα: Παπασωτηρίου.
- Βλαστός Θ και Μπιρμπίλη Τ (2000) Για την ανακατασκευή του δρόμου και την ανάκτηση των χαμένων ποιοτήτων του. Επτάκυκλος 16–17: 38–48.